After the events of last week, I'm a bit sensitive when it comes to matters like the one I'm about to discuss. Having the anti-vaccine cranks over at the Age of Autism weblog trying to get me fired over my blogging has a tendency to do that to me. (The details are out there if you haven't heard of it; I will say nothing more of it here.) In any case, if there's anything the events of last week drove home to me, it's that a sina qua non of anti-science cranks like the leaders of the anti-vaccine movement is that, when faced with serious scientific criticism, their preferred reaction is not to respond to that criticism with refutations based on science. They can't. Instead, their all too frequent response is to try to shut down criticism. We've seen it again and again, and I've discussed it many times on this blog.
Unfortunately, it's happening again. The favored laboratory of anti-vaccine practitioners and the "autism biomed" movement, a commercial laboratory known as [...]
From Respectful Insolence
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/insolence/~3/o4S27WNi350/more_legal_thuggery.php
7/1/2010 12:00:00 AM
Search rank: 446